California voters reject Prop 6 plan to repeal fuel tax hike

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on California voters reject Prop 6 plan to repeal fuel tax hike
Nov 072018


By Amanda del Castillo
Wednesday, November 07, 2018
SAN FRANCISCO (KGO) –California voters have rejected a proposal to repeal a gasoline tax increase that was passed by the Legislature to fund road and transportation projects.

>>> California and Bay Area election results here

>>> National election results here

Proposition 6 failed Tuesday after Democrats campaigned to preserve $5 billion a year to fix roads and improve transit.

Senate Bill 1 passed last year, increasing California’s gas tax by 12 cents per gallon and increasing registration fees by about $50 dollars per vehicle.

These taxes and fees have since paid for the construction and improvement of thousands of road, highway, bridge and transit repairs throughout the state.

At stake Tuesday night wasn’t just the estimated $5.4 billion a year from SB 1 money, but also how California could raise money to pay for any future transportation improvements.

Read more here…

UT: San Diego region to receive $311 million in new gas tax funding

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on UT: San Diego region to receive $311 million in new gas tax funding
May 032018

Projects to see a funding boost from the new gas tax include coastal double tracking and Interstate 5 widening, seen here under construction near the San Elijo Lagoon at Manchester Avenue. (Nelvin C. Cepeda / San Diego Union-Tribune)


By Joshua Emerson Smith

The San Diego region is poised to receive $311 million in funding from the state’s new gas tax.

Much of the fund will go to large-scale projects overseen by the San Diego Association of Governments or SANDAG.

The money represents a “major infusion of funds,” SANDAG Chair and Del MarCouncilmember Terry Sinnott said in a press statement. “With more than $311 million recommended for award … construction can start in the coming months to deliver transportation system improvements, including adding carpool lanes, improving rail lines and building biking and walking paths.”

California Transportation Commission staff recommended the award to help pay for major projects in the region. The commission will vote on final approval when it meets in San Diego on May 16 and 17.

Read more

California gas tax increase is now law. What it costs you and what it fixes

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on California gas tax increase is now law. What it costs you and what it fixes
Jul 252017

California Backlog of Deferred Road Maintenance has Become “Critical”

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on California Backlog of Deferred Road Maintenance has Become “Critical”
Jan 282017

Crews work last February on a joint construction project between Caltrans and the city of Sacramento near Capitol Mall. The governor and Legislature haven’t been able to agree yet on a transportation funding plan. (Rich Pedroncelli Associated Press)

Infrastructure Asset Management 101: Manage Existing Assets First

 Uncategorized  Comments Off on Infrastructure Asset Management 101: Manage Existing Assets First
Aug 052014


A water main break near the University of California, Los Angeles, Tuesday caused massive street flooding and damage at the university's campus.

Image courtesy of Danny Moloshok / Reuters. Obtained from

Los Angeles, California is just days removed from a massive water line break at the UCLA campus that spewed over 20 million(!) gallons of potable drinking water.  This unfortunate accident comes at a time when the state of California is in the midst of one the most severe and prolonged droughts in recent memory – a drought so bad that the state and some local agencies have formally authorized the issuance of $500+ fines for private residents who are seen “excessively” watering their lawns, drive ways, or even washing their cars.

The 30″ water main that broke at the UCLA campus was old…really old – 93 years old, in fact.  Aside from the obvious costs of losing 20 million gallons of fresh drinking water in the height of a drought, there are also untold other costs related to sinkhole and road way repair, damage to flooded facilities and other assets, and labor costs and loss of countless man hours spent repairing the damage that will continue for weeks and months from now.  Pauley Pavilion, alone, underwent a $136 million renovation that was completed just 2 years ago and it’s historic basketball court may need to be replaced due to flood damage.

Meanwhile, as existing critical public infrastructure assets like water lines crumble here in California, state lawmakers set their sights on ambitious and controversial multi-billion dollar insfrastructure projects such as high speed rail and wind energy production…rather than placing an emphasis on improving and updating what has already been built.  The goals of such new infrastructure projects are well-intended, but they come at a high price in the form of high upfront costs, unintended endangerment to the environment and/or wildlife, and the unseen costs of a dollar spent here is a dollar not spent on existing crumbling infrastructure.

Here’s an analogy – the water lines to your house are old and they often leak and break, leaving you without water to drink, cook, bathe, etc. and costing you countless dollars in lost water.  Rather than spend $1000 to replace or repair your crumbling water lines, you decide to take out a $1 million dollar loan to purchase an airplane and install a state-of-the-art wind turbine energy system.  The airplane will help you get from point A to B faster than ever and you’ll be cutting down on wasted fuel and time spent in traffic.  Similarly, the wind turbine energy system will help you cut down on your fossil-fuel consumption, but it might accidentally butcher an eagle or condor or more that flies into the fan blades.  Meanwhile, you are still paying the price for wasting a boatload of drinking water due to faulty pipes.

What’s the lesson learned in all of this?  Consider spending existing scarce resources on improving vital infrastructure back to a serviceable level – rather than spending on questionable new infrastructure where the cost/benefit of doing so is unclear at best.